Recently
I listened to a broadcast from the BBC which highlighted a series of
issues believed to be having a detrimental effect on the wildlife in
and around our inland waterways. Has humans we have taken to science
for producing tens of thousands of different chemicals. Many of which
are used for creating everyday household products. Our knowledge has
also added into the mix those chemicals used for creating drugs for
fighting diseases. Then there are the agricultural pesticides and
fertilisers. All of which are added together in our watercourses. Add
to this the happy abandon that people have for the environment by
dumping almost anything and everything into the the local canal.
To a
point we understand some of the effects that chemicals can have
through pharmaceutical research. What we don't know or understand is
what happens when hundreds and possibly thousands of chemicals are
mixed together at random in our rivers and canals. The issue is made
even more complex when the contaminant chemicals are mixed in
different concentrations. To all intents and purposes its a
potentially toxic chemical cocktail.
Water
treatment plants are usually co-located with our rivers. Contaminated
water in all its forms is sent into our sewage farms where solids are
first removed. The liquids are then passed into water treatment
plants for further cleansing. The water leaving the water treatment
plants still carries a reduced amount of the chemical cocktail that
the thousands of everyday items create. What the latest research is
starting to throw up is that even in diluted form the cocktail is
having an effect on the food chain.
River
water tends to flow downhill, at a varying speed depending on the
rainfall. So river flows can change significantly. The chemicals used
to create popular drugs such as antibiotic's and other drugs used as
anti-depressants. Which can have a detrimental effect on the
creatures living in and around the waterways. Creating problems such
as breeding defects and in some cases even the ability to breed at
all. A great deal of ongoing research is beginning to highlight some
of the links and causes that are pointing to some of the changes in
behaviour that are taking place.
Often the
creatures living in our waterways also provide food sources for other
wildlife such as birds. Like DDT had a significant detrimental effect
upon some species of birds. So some of the chemical compounds are
being found in the food web which may concentrate in those predators
at the top of the food chain. The whole cause and effect of such
chemical contamination is creating some concern amongst
environmentalists. I can't help but wonder if there is good reason
for the trust to be employing people in this capacity.
The level
of contaminants in river water can vary significantly due to the
dilution caused by clean rainwater entering the catchment. Large
water flow can also help to remove containments by scouring the river
channels. There are natural watercourses such as rivers. There are
also heavily engineered watercourses, which tend to be straightened
or a mixture of both. The sediment build up will vary significantly
in each type. However, where sections of canal get their water feed
from rivers. In particular those that have treatment plants upstream.
The flow of water is restricted and contamination can build up in the
sediment layers as well as concentrate in solution.
I was
struck by one throw away comment in particular. The conversation
revolved around the responsibility of government and its agencies to
tackle these issues. One commentator said – he was worried that
some management for the waterways were in the hands of various
charities. It was in his opinions a problem that was outside of the
capabilities of charities to manage. Especially where funds would
always be at some risk. He said it was essential for the government
to take the whole issue of the management of waterways in house and
to provide a concerted effort in the cleaning up of the watercourses
from streams through to rivers.
However,
the more I reflect on the issue, the more I see a possible reason for
the government not to transfer other waterways into the stewardship
of the trust. I can in fact see reasons why when the economy improves
the inland waterways as we know them today, might be taken back in
house through necessity.
I am
lucky that I have a close friend who has come to visit us here in
Spain. Who is a very knowledgeable person on some aspects of the very
subject. Whose PhD research was based upon river flows and the
effects upon sedimentation. So I was able to ask a few questions
about their experience and in some cases gained a better
understanding of some of the technical terminology used.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please put your name to your comment. Comments without a name may automatically be treated as spam and might not be included.
If you do not wish your comment to be published say so in your comment. If you have a tip or sensitive information you’d prefer to share anonymously, you may do so. I will delete the comment after reading.