I have
a tail to relate, but first I need to set the scene.
We are
all aware that the excesses of the media were highlighted during the
Leveson Inquiry. A judicial public inquiry held into the base
culture, illegal practices and lack of ethics of the British press
following the News International phone hacking scandal. However, the
main issue in reality is that the media now lies in the hands of a
wealthy few. Acting like a cartel and wielding a level of control and
power for which there is still not a robust system to curtail their
excesses. At great public expense we had a legal process examining
the remit under which the media operates. The Leveson Inquiry was
conducted at great length and depth where all sides had the
opportunity to express a view. The enquiry brought forward some
sensible recommendations.
I find
it hard to get my head around the less than honest, bullying
newspaper coverage targeted at Jeremy Corbyn. Other than the
newsprint owners are already perceiving the likelihood of a future
'prime minister' Corbyn as a threat. If Corbyn is so ineffectual as
they would have us believe, why target him in the first place.
Roundabout
the same time, as the Leveson inquiry there were other police led
enquiries and ultimately trials conducted where people were even sent
to prison. The government failed to bring in a robust system of
scrutiny, armed with tough penalties, where the excesses of the
media might be curtailed. I think that when Labour come to power,
the recommendations of the Leveson Inquiry should be revisited.
Worryingly,
we now we see that for less than altruistic reasons, the media has
with complete impunity reverted back to where it was prior to
Leveson. So for weeks there has been this onslaught of lies and half
truth and deliberate misquotes blaming Corbyn for just about
everything. However, it is now becoming something of a paradox. One
that that has backfired upon the newsprint owners. Simply because you
can never challenge a moral compass and compassion that the public
(whether they agree with Corbyn or not) see in the man himself. They
might not agree with is personal ideals – but they are increasingly
more and more sympathetic to his plight.
I have
set the scene, now I have an interesting encounter to relate.
I have
a good friend – we are at opposite ends of the political spectrum –
misguided as I believe him to be – and he likewise about me. We
have often discussed, argued and even sulked with each other over
politics. We can't even agree to disagree. One of his pet gripes as
always been the level of dishonesty in politics and the media. He now
harbours thoughts that Corbyn could actually clean up politics and in
his words 'sort out the media barons'. I asked how that could come
around. He said 'I could never vote labour in a local election. But
I would happily vote for him [Corbyn] in a general election.' I was completely
perplexed as to why there should be such a shift in his opinion. He
said 'he [Corbyn] is basically a honest man and I know I could trust
him. If this country is ever to succeed we need a clean up in
Westminster.' His wife, piped up.
'Has he told you he has cancelled the Sun.' He just smiled at me and
nodded. I had nothing, not a single word to say. He even asked me for
my Corbyn badge. I gave it to him, I gave away the one thing I wear with pride at
every opportunity. It now has found a new home. He is not and never
would be a convert to socialism, but he is a convert to Corbyn
politics. So now I am beginning to understand more, the reason why so
many people joined and voted for Jeremy. What's happening transcends
political tribal alliances. Corbyn has appeal in places where other
labour politicians could never tread. His appeal obviously
encompasses much more than Socialists, Greens and disaffected Liberals.