I
have decided that the Internet is infected with a bad case of
Mondegreen. What in heavens name are mondegreens? I hear you
say, so if you quieten down for a moment at the back, I'm just about
to explain.
Mondegreens
are a mishearing or misinterpretation of a phrase as a result of a
near homophony. In a way that gives the sentence a whole new meaning.
Mondegreens
are a sort of aural Malapropism.
Instead of saying or writing the wrong word, you hear or see the
wrong word. The word mondegreen
is generally used for misheard song lyrics, although technically it
can apply to any form of song or speech. Am I Right (amiright.com)
is a famous music humour site dealing in misheard song lyrics.
Mondegreens
are funny of course. They also give us insight into the underlying
nature of linguistic processing and how our minds make such almost
subliminal connections.
A
mondegreen is when you write or say something and then someone else
accidentally reads or hears it differently. A mondegreen is usually
an accidental misread or misheard comment. Lets say that you get
pulled over by the police and the copper says - 'I'm going to report
you for driving without duke hair and a truncheon!' Confusion
ensues, until you realise the truth of what you misheard.
In
a strange sort of way with mondegreens - its almost always misread or
misheard in exactly the way it was not contextually intended. But
with today's music lyrics – there are few if any clues. Because the
lyrics are often a jumble of seemingly meaningless rhyming words. We
even have an old saying 'reading between the lines' which
usually means we are going to put our own interpretation on it. By
reading into the message something that's not actually there. Or
putting two and two together and coming up with five.
Real
mondegreens can be thought of as a form of 'dyslexia of the mouth'
or just a simple 'smelling pisstake' (spoonerism) where both
are inadvertent and accidental. However, some comediennes have turned
a deliberate form of mondegreen, into an art form. Hilda Baker (A
lady small in stature but with a no nonsense attitude and a thick
northern regional accent) was one such master when she would talk
about having an 'hystericalrectomy!' or some other such woman's
complaint. With a smattering of throw-a-way (back handed)
complements such as 'Cynthia says you are not fit to live in a pig
sty – but I put her right and I told her you were!'
There
are other comparisons that can be made to mondegreens that are
neither inadvertent or accidental. Its
a bit like the current crop of so called newspapers – With owner
directed editorial direction – which today are lacking in either
independence or morality. A
typical example is When
asked by a reporter 'should
Tony Blair stand trial for war crimes?' Jeremy
Corbyn answers
'If he has committed a war crime, yes. Everyone who's committed a
war crime should be. When
asked 'Is
he going to be tried for it.' Jeremy
Corbyn answers
'I don't know.' When
asked 'Could
he be tried for it?' Jeremy
Corbyn answers
'Possibly.''
The
Express headline
said 'Tony
Blair must face trial for war crimes, says Jeremy Corbyn.
The
word for deliberate misreporting of the news is 'Black Propaganda'.
The world is full of propaganda. The real exponents of propaganda
(usually
political)
do it in such a way that the propaganda seems to be quite believable
and therefore is apparently acceptable. Propaganda is used to create
a false illusion. Propaganda is however generally accepted as being a
bad thing. There are very few if any newspapers available in the
United Kingdom, which have a free from control editorial content.
Especially one that is not being dictated by the newspaper owner.
White propaganda on the other hand are news items that are
deliberately ignored. Stories that should be on and in the news are
sometimes not reported (suppressed) by the media. Advertising revenue
can also dictate editorial direction. Usually when the main thrust of
the suppressed news item. Was aimed at one of the newspapers regular
advertisers. So for some big businesses, paying advertising revenue
can give you some protection from culpable exposure in the media.
However,
there are other comparisons that can be made to various shades of
propaganda that are also neither inadvertent or accidental. If
propaganda fails, the last bastion of covering up or distorting the
truth is Spin.
In the Palace of Westminster the political party which is in power
tend to employ the services of a team of 'spin
doctors'
to manipulate political information. There is also the periodic -
hide the bad news day – which normally takes place late on a Friday
afternoon or when some other cataclysmic event has captured the
media's attention. Spin is what Alan Clark MP referred to in the
super gun case. He said in court the government was being
'conservative
with the actuality'.
Clarke was even spinning the word 'lie'
into a representation of the word lie as being an almost acceptable
untruth. That phrase was engineered to say we are not 'telling
the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth'
as the courts should insist. But put in a spun form that was
seemingly acceptable to the courts. By this ruse legalese perceptions
are then distorted, political and legal wriggle room is thus created.
Thus the ultimate culpability is lessened.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please put your name to your comment. Comments without a name may automatically be treated as spam and might not be included.
If you do not wish your comment to be published say so in your comment. If you have a tip or sensitive information you’d prefer to share anonymously, you may do so. I will delete the comment after reading.